West Ham want VAR to be SCRAPPED by Premier League… it has been against us all season

MICHAIL ANTONIO summed up — much more politely than most — how everyone at West Ham feels about VAR following our win over Chelsea.

He said: “I really dislike VAR, I really dislike it. This season so many things have not gone our way.”

Michail Antonio was ruled offside Tomas Soucek’s goal was chalked off against Chelsea despite lying on the floor

Too right things have not gone our way. We are now the joint-worst affected­ Premier League side this season, alongside Sheffield United, in terms of VAR decisions.

VAR was brought in to reduce the number of innocent mistakes a referee makes during a game.

I understand that completely. With so much at stake, the pressure on the refs to get 100 per cent of decisions right is overwhelming.

And it’s not only the money that matters — with £2.4million per place (top club earning £159m and the bottom club £94.2m), the cost of relegation and massive financial benefits of the European places.

It’s also the fact the multi-angled cameras used by the broadcasters meant those watching the match at home knew the referee’s decision was wrong long before the final whistle was blown at the match.

But in this strangest of football seasons, it is clear VAR has not corrected those mistakes.

It has made its own.

Because the ref on the pitch has simply been replaced by one in a box — and not the penalty box. One in a box in a remote location in Stockley Park. A place that claims to have discovered a bronze age burial ground.

Maybe in the next century they will find the buried bones of past Premier League clubs, cast adrift by some ludicrous decisions that sent them into the abyss.

Otherwise known as the Championship.

Not only has it made mistakes, VAR is also testing the crowd’s patience.

Admittedly, the crowd on Wednesday night at London Stadium in these strangest of times, was just 20 directors, the extended subs on the bench and about 100 press. But we waited almost four minutes for VAR to come to a decision about Tomas Soucek’s goal.

It’s an unusual atmosphere being in an empty stadium watching a match but one of the few advantages is you can hear Gary Neville’s TV commentary from inside the stadium while you are in your seat.

At one point during those four minutes, I heard him say to the millions watching at home that if it takes this long for VAR to make a decision, then the goal should stand.

Common sense if I ever heard it. But as we are finding out, common sense is not a factor of VAR. The goal was ruled offside because Antonio — lying on his back, facing away from the goal — was at the same time deemed to be interfering with play.

Rules are rules, even the ludicrous ones.

Rules like handball, intentional or not, voiding goals.

Rules like your eyelashes being offside ruling out goals.

VAR was brought in to make 100 per cent of the ref’s decisions right but that’s not happened.

One man’s judgment, the ref’s, has been replaced by another man’s judgment — the man watching the video.

As we found out at Spurs when their handball (incidentally watched for a matter of seconds by VAR and not the four minutes we endured at London Stadium for the Soucek goal) was deemed unacceptable.

VAR was brought in to rule out inconsistences but still the inconsistences prevail. The whole point of VAR was to eliminate the referee’s individual mistake.

In reality, the buck has just passed to another referee who is not even in the stadium.

It is incredibly frustrating.

After watching us have a goal taken away, then giving away a soft penalty to go 1-0 down, most clubs would give up.

But not us. We just kept fighting, we kept going and we got the victory.

But the truth is VAR has been against us all season.

Even at an early Premier League meeting this year, when they reviewed the VAR decisions and admitted they got West Ham’s wrong, there was no apology.

We did what we did on Wednesday night.

Missed City penalty retaken due to encroachment by Hammers ace Declan Rice. Retake scored by Sergio Aguero in the 86th minute.

Josh King goal, originally ruled out for offside, cleared by the VAR so Cherries levelled in what ended up a 2-2 draw.

Jordan Ayew goal was awarded after originally being ruled out for offside in the 87th minute as the Eagles won 2-1.

Rice’s 89th-minute goal disallowed for offside as Spurs edged the game 3-2.

Goal for Michail Antonio ruled out for handball on 67 minutes although the Hammers did go on to win the game 1-0.

Antonio’s 52nd-minute strike was again chalked off for handball in another close game.

Last-minute leveller for Robert Snodgrass ruled out for handball in the build-up by Rice as the hosts hung on for a 1-0 victory.

Glenn Murray’s leveller for hosts in a 3-3 thriller allowed after incorrect handball on 79 minutes.

Alexandre Lacazette 78th-minute 1-0 winner allowed after incorrect offside against Mesut Ozil.

Tomas Soucek own goal given despite the ball hitting Davison Sanchez’s arm as Spurs won 2-0.

Soucek goal disallowed for offside against Hammers ace Antonio.

We buck up, knuckle down and keep fighting.

But something has to give at some point.

It is time to show VAR the red card.

Both sets of players and referee Martin Atkinson were made to wait four minutes for the VAR at Stockley Park to make the decision

West Ham have been on the receiving end of their fair share of tough VAR decisions alongside European-chasing Sheffield United


By: Joshua Jones
Title: West Ham want VAR to be SCRAPPED by Premier League… it has been against us all season
Sourced From:
Published Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 21:36:00 +0000